李杰, 晏磊, 陈森, 杨炳忠, 张鹏. 基于不同配重的罩网沉降性能研究[J]. 南方水产科学, 2016, 12(5): 16-22. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2016.05.003
引用本文: 李杰, 晏磊, 陈森, 杨炳忠, 张鹏. 基于不同配重的罩网沉降性能研究[J]. 南方水产科学, 2016, 12(5): 16-22. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2016.05.003
LI Jie, YAN Lei, CHEN Sen, YANG Bingzhong, ZHANG Peng. Study on sinking performance of falling-net base on different weights[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2016, 12(5): 16-22. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2016.05.003
Citation: LI Jie, YAN Lei, CHEN Sen, YANG Bingzhong, ZHANG Peng. Study on sinking performance of falling-net base on different weights[J]. South China Fisheries Science, 2016, 12(5): 16-22. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2016.05.003

基于不同配重的罩网沉降性能研究

Study on sinking performance of falling-net base on different weights

  • 摘要: 2015年3月于南海南沙海域进行了1 515 kg、1 615 kg、1 715 kg和1 815 kg等4组不同沉力配重下罩网沉降性能的对比试验。结果发现:1)多元回归分析表明网口最大沉降深度D与配重W、放网时间Ts、绞收时间Th及风速Sw成正相关,与漂移速度Sd呈负相关;2)偏相关系数分析显示,配重的相对重要性大于放网时间,且放网时间过长不利于网口迅速闭合,故认为增加配重是比延长放网时间更加实用有效的增大网口沉降深度的方法;3)随配重的增加,网口最大沉降深度的平均值依次为77.5 m、81.5 m、83.7 m和 97.9 m,网口沉降速度的平均值依次为0.303 ms-1、0.318 ms-1、0.342 ms-1和0.349 ms-1, 两者均随配重的增大而增加,且单因素方差分析发现两者在不同配重组间均存在显著性差异;4)认为1 715 kg为试验罩网的最优配重。

     

    Abstract: We compared the sinking performance of falling-net of four different weights (1 515 kg, 1 615 kg, 1 715 kg and 1 815 kg) near the Spratly Islands in the South China Sea. The results show that: 1) according to multiple regression model, the maximum sinking depth (D) was positively correlated with weights (W) , shooting duration (Ts), hauling duration (Th) and wind speed (Sw), but negatively correlated with drift speed (Sd). 2) The partial correlation coefficients show that the relative materiality of weight was greater than shooting duration, and overlong shooting duration was bad for fast closing of net mouth, so it is suggested that increasing weights is a more effective method to increase the sinking depth than extending shooting duration. 3) With increasing weight, the average maximum sinking depths of net mouth were 77.5 m, 81.5 m, 83.7 m and 97.9 m, respectively; the average sinking speeds were 0.303 ms-1 , 0.318 ms-1, 0.342 ms-1 and 0.349 ms-1, respectively, both increased with weight; and One-Way analysis of variance reveals that significant difference existed in the maximum sinking depth and sinking speed among four different weights. 4) It is concluded that 1 715 kg is the optimum weight.

     

/

返回文章
返回