留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

硫酸铜、敌百虫、聚维酮碘对吉富罗非鱼的急性毒性及组织病理学研究

戴瑜来 王宇希 许宝青 戴杨鑫 林启存 蔡丽娟

戴瑜来, 王宇希, 许宝青, 戴杨鑫, 林启存, 蔡丽娟. 硫酸铜、敌百虫、聚维酮碘对吉富罗非鱼的急性毒性及组织病理学研究[J]. 南方水产科学. doi: 10.12131/20230093
引用本文: 戴瑜来, 王宇希, 许宝青, 戴杨鑫, 林启存, 蔡丽娟. 硫酸铜、敌百虫、聚维酮碘对吉富罗非鱼的急性毒性及组织病理学研究[J]. 南方水产科学. doi: 10.12131/20230093
DAI Yulai, WANG Yuxi, XU Baoqing, DAI Yangxin, LIN Qicun, CAI Lijuan. Study on acute toxicity and histopathology of copper sulfate, trichlorfon and povidone-iodine to GIFT tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)[J]. South China Fisheries Science. doi: 10.12131/20230093
Citation: DAI Yulai, WANG Yuxi, XU Baoqing, DAI Yangxin, LIN Qicun, CAI Lijuan. Study on acute toxicity and histopathology of copper sulfate, trichlorfon and povidone-iodine to GIFT tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)[J]. South China Fisheries Science. doi: 10.12131/20230093

硫酸铜、敌百虫、聚维酮碘对吉富罗非鱼的急性毒性及组织病理学研究

doi: 10.12131/20230093
基金项目: 杭州市农业科技协作与创新攻关项目 (202209TD16);杭州市科技特派员专项 (20221122I35);杭州市农科院科技创新与示范推广基金项目 (2022HNCT-01)
详细信息
    通讯作者:

    戴瑜来 (1986—),男,工程师,硕士,研究方向为水产病害防治与水域环境监测。E-mail: dylaiuai111@163.com

  • 中图分类号: S 948

Study on acute toxicity and histopathology of copper sulfate, trichlorfon and povidone-iodine to GIFT tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)

  • 摘要: 为评估水产养殖中常用药物——硫酸铜、敌百虫、聚维酮碘的合理给药量及其安全性,以及对吉富罗非鱼 (Oreochromis niloticus) 的毒害作用,采用静态急性毒性试验法,研究了这3种药物对吉富罗非鱼鱼苗的急性毒性及组织病理影响。结果表明,硫酸铜对吉富罗非鱼24、48和96 h的半致死浓度 (LC50) 分别为13.715、10.351和5.896 mg∙L−1,安全浓度 (SC) 为1.769 mg∙L−1;敌百虫对吉富罗非鱼24、48和96 h的LC50分别为43.036、25.887 和16.689 mg∙L−1,SC为2.810 mg∙L−1;聚维酮碘对吉富罗非鱼24、48和96 h的LC50分别为10.509、9.301和8.674 mg∙L−1,SC为2.190 mg∙L−1。组织病理学研究结果显示,硫酸铜暴露可造成鳃丝轮廓模糊不清、鳃组织空泡化,肝组织空隙变大、空泡化、细胞核萎缩,脑组织神经纤维出现破损、细胞凋亡,肾小管结构破坏、核膜破损;敌百虫暴露可造成鳃组织破坏、细胞凋亡,肝组织无核化、线粒体肿胀及空泡化,脑组织神经纤维破损、核固缩,肾间质出血;聚维酮碘暴露可造成鳃丝萎缩、线粒体双层膜结构不完整,肝组织空泡化、细胞出现凋亡,神经纤维轻微破损。研究表明,硫酸铜、敌百虫、聚维酮碘对于该研究规格的吉富罗非鱼是较为安全的药物,但需谨慎控制使用剂量,以免造成不可逆的组织损伤。
  • 图  1  不同药物作用下鳃组织的变化

    注:a. 对照组;b. 8.435 mg∙L−1硫酸铜处理组;c. 28.284 mg∙L−1敌百虫处理组;d. 16.870 mg∙L−1聚维酮碘处理组。

    Figure  1.  Changes of gill by different drugs

    Note: a. Control group; b. 8.435 mg∙L−1 copper sulfate treatment; c. 28.284 mg∙L−1 trichlorfon treatment; d. 16.870 mg∙L−1 povidone-iodine treatment.

    图  2  不同药物作用下肝组织的变化

    注:a. 对照组;b. 8.435 mg∙L−1硫酸铜处理组;c. 28.284 mg∙L−1敌百虫处理组;d. 16.870 mg∙L−1聚维酮碘处理组。

    Figure  2.  Changes of liver by different drugs

    Note: a. Control group; b. 8.435 mg∙L−1 copper sulfate treatment; c. 28.284 mg∙L−1 trichlorfon treatment; d. 16.870 mg∙L−1 povidone-iodine treatment.

    图  3  不同药物作用下脑组织的变化

    注:a. 对照组;b. 8.435 mg∙L−1硫酸铜处理组;c. 28.284 mg∙L−1敌百虫处理组;d. 16.870 mg∙L−1聚维酮碘处理组。

    Figure  3.  Changes of brain by different drugs

    Note: a. Control group; b. 8.435 mg∙L−1 copper sulfate treatment; c. 28.284 mg∙L−1 trichlorfon treatment; d. 16.870 mg∙L−1 povidone-iodine treatment.

    图  4  不同药物作用下肾组织的变化

    注:a. 对照组;b. 8.435 mg∙L−1硫酸铜处理组;c. 28.284 mg∙L−1敌百虫处理组;d. 16.870 mg∙L−1聚维酮碘处理组。

    Figure  4.  Changes of kidney by different drugs

    Note: a. Control group; b. 8.435 mg∙L−1 copper sulfate treatment; c. 28.284 mg∙L−1 trichlorfon treatment; d. 16.870 mg∙L−1 povidone-iodine treatment.

    图  5  不同药物作用下鳃组织的变化 (透射电镜)

    注:a. 对照组 (15 000×);b. 8.435 mg∙L−1硫酸铜处理组 (8 000×);c. 28.284 mg∙L−1敌百虫处理组 (8 000×);d. 16.870 mg∙L−1聚维酮碘处理组 (15 000×)。

    Figure  5.  Changes of gill by different drugs (TEM)

    Note: a. Control group (15 000×); b. 8.435 mg∙L−1 copper sulfate treatment (8 000×); c. 28.284 mg∙L−1 trichlorfon treatment (8 000×); d. 16.870 mg∙L−1 povidone-iodine treatment (15 000×).

    图  6  不同药物作用下肝组织的变化 (透射电镜)

    注:a. 对照组 (8 000×);b. 8.435 mg∙L−1硫酸铜处理组 (7 000×);c. 28.284 mg∙L−1敌百虫处理组 (25 000×);d. 16.870 mg∙L−1聚维酮碘处理组 (10 000×)。

    Figure  6.  Changes of liver by different drugs (TEM)

    Note:a. Control group (8 000×); b. 8.435 mg∙L−1 copper sulfate treatment (7 000×); c. 28.284 mg∙L−1 trichlorfon treatment (25 000×); d. 16.870 mg∙L−1 povidone-iodine treatment (10 000×).

    图  7  不同药物作用下脑组织的变化 (射电镜)

    注:a. 对照组 (10 000×);b. 8.435 mg∙L−1硫酸铜处理组 (8 000)×;c. 28.284 mg∙L−1敌百虫处理组 (8 000×);d. 16.870 mg∙L−1聚维酮碘处理组 (8 000×)。

    Figure  7.  Changes of brain by different drugs (EM)

    Note: a. Control group (10 000×); b. 8.435 mg∙L−1 copper sulfate treatment (8 000×); c. 28.284 mg∙L−1 trichlorfon treatment (8 000×); d. 16.870 mg∙L−1 povidone-iodine treatment (8 000×).

    图  8  不同药物作用下肾组织的变化 (电镜)

    注:a. 对照组 (8 000×);b. 8.435 mg∙L−1硫酸铜处理组 (8 000×);c. 28.284 mg∙L−1敌百虫处理组 (10 000×);d. 16.870 mg∙L−1聚维酮碘处理组 (10 000×)。

    Figure  8.  Changes of kidney by different drugs (EM)

    Note: a. Control group (8 000×); b. 8.435 mg∙L−1 copper sulfate treatment (8 000×); c. 28.284 mg∙L−1 trichlorfon treatment (10 000×); d. 16.870 mg∙L−1 povidone-iodine treatment (10 000×).

    表  1  用药浓度

    Table  1.   Concentrations of test drugs

    药物 Drug质量浓度 Mass concentration/(mg∙L−1)
    IIIIIIIVV
    硫酸铜 Copper sulphate 1.500 2.667 4.743 8.435 15.000
    敌百虫 Trichlorfon 10.000 14.142 20.000 28.284 40.000
    聚维酮碘Povidone iodine 3.000 5.335 9.487 16.870 30.000
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  硫酸铜对吉富罗非鱼的毒性试验结果

    Table  2.   Effects of copper sulfate on GIFT tilapia

    质量浓度
    Mass concentration/
    (mg∙L−1)
    试验鱼数
    Number of tests/
    平均死亡率
    Average mortality
    LC50 及 95% 置信区间
    LC50 and 95% confidence interval/(mg∙L−1)
    安全浓度
    SC/(mg∙L−1)
    24 h48 h96 h24 h48 h96 h
    1.500300.0000.0000.00013.715
    (10.800~17.417)
    10.351
    (7.925~13.519)
    5.896
    (4.860~7.152)
    1.769
    2.667300.0000.0000.067
    4.743300.0000.1220.344
    8.435300.1110.3330.711
    15.000300.5440.6891.000
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  敌百虫对吉富罗非鱼的毒性试验结果

    Table  3.   Effects of trichlorfon on GIFT tilapia

    质量浓度
    Mass concentration/
    (mg∙L−1)
    试验鱼数
    Number
    of tests/尾
    平均死亡率
    Average mortality
    LC50 及 95% 置信区间
    LC50 and 95% confidence interval/(mg∙L−1)
    安全浓度
    SC/(mg∙L−1)
    24 h48 h96 h24 h48 h96 h
    10.000 30 0.000 0.044 0.100 43.036
    (36.065~51.356)
    25.887
    (20.473~32.733)
    16.689
    (13.589~20.496)
    2.810
    14.142 30 0.033 0.089 0.367
    20.000 30 0.000 0.156 0.611
    28.284 30 0.100 0.578 0.944
    40.000 30 0.156 0.890 1.000
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  聚维酮碘对吉富罗非鱼的毒性试验结果

    Table  4.   Effects of povidone iodine on GIFT tilapia

    质量浓度
    Mass concentration/
    (mg∙L−1)
    试验鱼数
    Number of tests/

    平均死亡率
    Average mortality
    LC50 及 95% 置信区间/mg∙L−1
    LC50 and 95% confidence interval/(mg∙L−1)
    安全浓度
    SC/(mg∙L−1)
    24 h48 h96 h24 h48 h96 h
    3.000 30 0.000 0.00 0.00 10.509
    (8.135~13.576)
    9.301
    (7.457~11.615)
    8.674
    (7.164~10.503)
    2.190
    5.335 30 0.078 0.089 0.089
    9.487 30 0.467 0.533 0.567
    16.870 30 0.778 0.911 1.000
    30.000 30 1.000 1.000 1.000
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  3种药物常用质量浓度与安全浓度对比

    Table  5.   Comparison of three drugs commonly used and safe concentrations of drugs

    药物
    Drug
    常用质量浓度
    Common
    concentration/
    (mg∙L−1)
    安全浓度
    Safe
    concentration/
    (mg∙L−1)
    硫酸铜 Copper sulfate 0.4~0.7 (泼洒)[40] 1.769
    敌百虫 Trichlorfon 0.2~0.5 (泼洒)[41] 2.810
    聚维酮碘 Povidone iodine 0.2~0.5 (泼洒)[42] 2.190
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 颜子渊, 邓真德, 张竞, 等. 环境铜离子对吉富罗非鱼生长性能、脂代谢、肝胰脏和脾脏组织的影响[J]. 水生生物学报, 2022, 46(11): 1631-1641.
    [2] 祝璟琳, 邹芝英, 李大宇, 等. 四个罗非鱼选育品种抗链球菌病能力差异研究[J]. 水生生物学报, 2017, 41(6): 1232-1241.
    [3] 刘伟, 蒋明, 吴凡, 等. 饲料能量密度和投喂水平对吉富罗非鱼生长和健康的影响[J]. 水生生物学报, 2022, 46(1): 58-68.
    [4] REVITA S, ADI B, MARINA E, et al. Temporal trends of tilapia lake virus disease in Israel, 2017-2018[J]. Transbound Emerg Dis, 2020, 68(6): 3025-3033.
    [5] ZHANG D F, GAO Y X, KE X L, et al. Bacillus velezensis LF01: in vitro antimicrobial activity against fish pathogens, growth performance enhancement, and disease resistance against streptococcosis in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)[J]. Appl Microbiol Biot, 2019, 103(21-22): 9023-9035. doi: 10.1007/s00253-019-10176-8
    [6] NICHOLSON P, MONON N, JAEMWIMOL P, et al. Coinfection of tilapia lake virus and Aeromonas hydrophila synergistically increased mortality and worsened the disease severity in tilapia (Oreochromis spp. )[J]. Aquaculture, 2020, 520: 734746. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.734746
    [7] AMPHAN S, UNAJAK S, PRINTRAKOON C, et al. Feeding-regimen of β-glucan to enhance innate immunity and disease resistance of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus Linn., against Aeromonas hydrophila and Flavobacterium columnare[J]. Fish Shellfish Imm, 2019, 87: 120-128. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2018.12.062
    [8] MARINANNA V R, JULIANA F C, FRANCISCO B G, et al. Sinuolinea niloticus n. sp., a myxozoan parasite that causes disease in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)[J]. Parasitol Res, 2016, 115(11): 4307-4316. doi: 10.1007/s00436-016-5214-z
    [9] PÁDUA S B, FILHO R N M, MARTINS M L, et al. A survey of epitheliocystis disease in farmed Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus Linnaeus, 1758) in Brazil[J]. J Appl Ichthyol, 2015, 31(5): 927-930. doi: 10.1111/jai.12840
    [10] HARRISON C K, SHIMAE A, ESTHER M, et al. Genetic parameters for black spot disease (diplopstomiasis) caused by Uvulifer sp. infection in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L. )[J]. Aquaculture, 2020, 532: 736039.
    [11] TAVARES-DIAS M, MARCHIORI N D C, MARTINS M L. Paratrichodina africana (Ciliophora: Trichodinidae) of wild and cultured Nile tilapia in the Northern Brazil Paratrichodina africana (Ciliophora: Trichodinidae) de tilápia do Nilo selvagem e cultivada no Norte do Brasil[J]. Rev Bras Parasitol V, 2018, 22(2): 248-252.
    [12] AGUSTINA S S, TASRUDDIN, LAYOO N. The use of concentration of piper betle leaf extracts in commercial feed to parasites intensity of Trichodina sp. that attacked tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)[J]. J Phy, 2019, 1179: 012182.
    [13] XU W N, LIU W B, LIU Z P. Trichlorfon-induced apoptosis in hepatocyte primary cultures of Carassius auratus gibelio[J]. Chemosphere, 2009, 77(7): 895-901. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.08.043
    [14] VARANKA Z, ROJIK I, VARANKA I, et al. Biochemical and morphological changes in carp (Cyprinus carpio L. ) liver following exposure to copper sulfate and tannic acid[J]. Comp Biochem Phys C, 2001, 467-478.
    [15] HEDAYATI A, DARABITABAR F, BAGHERI T, et al. Histopathological impairment of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) induced through povidone-iodine exposure[J]. Microsc Res Techniq, 2018, 81(11): 1257-1260. doi: 10.1002/jemt.23131
    [16] 缪成贤, 张亚群, 闫振龙, 等. 毒性试验组织病理学结果有害作用判断概述[J]. 药物评价研究, 2022, 45(8): 1480-1486.
    [17] 周永欣, 章宗涉. 水生生物学毒性试验方法[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1989: 79-83.
    [18] 明道绪. 兽医统计方法[M]. 成都: 成都科技大学出版社, 1991: 200-203.
    [19] 赵巧雅. 重金属铜对斑马鱼鳃的毒性作用研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2017: 27-31.
    [20] 李天才, 刘小帅, 刘明昌, 等. 硫酸铜对不同规格短须裂腹鱼苗的急性毒性研究[J]. 南方农业学报, 2021, 52(3): 837-846.
    [21] AARDT W J V, HOUGH M. The effect of short-term Cu exposure on the oxygen consumption and Cu accumulation of mudfish (Labeo capensis) and the largemouth bass (Micropteris salmoides) in hard water[J]. Water SA, 2007, 33(5): 701-708.
    [22] JOOYANDEH F, SADEGHPOUR A, KHARA H, et al. Histopathological and bacterial study of skin and gill of grass carp, Ceteopharyngodon idella, (Valenciennes 1844) exposed to copper sulfate and potassium permanganate[J]. J Parasit Dis, 2016, 40(3): 1009-1013. doi: 10.1007/s12639-014-0625-1
    [23] 胡亚东. 纳米铜和硫酸铜暴露对暗纹东方鲀组织病变及内质网应激的影响[D]. 南京: 南京师范大学, 2020: 51.
    [24] 马莉芳. 水体铜对黄河鲤毒性的研究[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2013: 15-16.
    [25] FENG T, LI Z B, GUO X Q, et al. Effects of trichlorfon and sodium dodecyl sulphate on antioxidant defense system and acetylcholinesterase of Tilapia nilotica in vitro[J]. Pestic Biochem Phys, 2008, 92(3): 107-113. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2007.10.002
    [26] 辛桂瑜, 侯小露, 梁敏敏, 等. 敌百虫对奥尼罗非鱼幼鱼的急性毒性及安全浓度评价[J]. 水产科技情报, 2021, 48(1): 45-50.
    [27] 吴中华. 晶体敌百虫对黄鳝肝组织、酶活性及相关去毒基因表达的影响[D]. 南昌: 江西农业大学, 2014: 10-21.
    [28] CARDOSO I, SOARES M, ANGELIS C, et al. Physiological and biochemical responses of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) to acute trichlorfon exposure[J]. Int Aquat Res, 2020, 12(4): 243-253.
    [29] WANG X F, CHANG X L, ZHAO L F, et al. Trichlorfon exposure in common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) leads to oxidative stress, neurotoxicity, and immune responses[J]. Aquaculture, 2022, 548: 737681. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.737681
    [30] XU W N, LIU W B, LIU Z P. Trichlorfon-induced apoptosis in hepatocyte primary cultures of Carassius auratus gibelio[J]. Chemosphere, 2009, 77(7): 895-901. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.08.043
    [31] XU W N, LIU W B, SHAO X P, et al. Effect of trichlorfon on hepatic lipid accumulation in crucian carp Carassius auratus gibelio[J]. J Aquat Anim Health, 2012, 24(3): 185-194. doi: 10.1080/08997659.2012.675937
    [32] CHANG X L, WANG X F, FENG J C, et al. Impact of chronic exposure to trichlorfon on intestinal barrier, oxidative stress, inflammatory response and intestinal microbiome in common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.)[J]. Environ Pollut, 2020, 259: 113846. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113846
    [33] TAWEEL A, SHUHAIMI-OTHMAN M, AHMAD A K. In vivo acute toxicity tests of some heavy metals to tilapia fish (Oreochromis niloticus)[J]. J Biol Sci, 2013, 13(5): 365-371. doi: 10.3923/jbs.2013.365.371
    [34] 李燕华, 王梦杰, 马本贺, 等. 3种常用渔药对攀鲈幼鱼的急性毒性试验[J]. 水产科技情报, 2021, 48(2): 94-98.
    [35] OWARI N B, 马晶晶, 王鸣, 等. 三种常用药物对黑鲷幼鱼的急性毒性试验[J]. 饲料工业, 2010, 31(16): 45-46.
    [36] 陈罗明, 凌去非, 魏宾, 等. 四种常用鱼药对梭鲈鱼种的急性毒性实验[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2006, 25: 492-495.
    [37] 孙博, 刘琦, 裘丽萍, 等. 2种渔药对吉富罗非鱼幼鱼急性毒性研究[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2015, 38(11): 125-129.
    [38] 施钢, 陈刚, 张健东, 等. 4种水产药物对蓝点笛鲷幼鱼急性毒性试验[J]. 南方水产科学, 2011, 7(3): 50-55.
    [39] 罗刚, 许建和, 滕亚娟. 五种药物对梭鱼鱼种的急性毒性试验[J]. 水产科技情报, 2012, 39(1): 42-45.
    [40] SILVA A F D, CRUZ C D, REZENDE F R L D, et al. Copper sulfate acute ecotoxicity and environmental risk for tropical fish[J]. Acta Sci-Biol Sci, 2014, 36(4): 377-381. doi: 10.4025/actascibiolsci.v36i4.18373
    [41] 周剑, 杜军, 刘光迅, 等. 4种常用药物对长薄鳅幼鱼的急性毒性试验研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2012, 25(5): 1920-1924.
    [42] 张俊杰, 鄢庆枇, 李胜忠, 等. 聚维酮碘和二氧化氯对泥鳅的急性毒性试验[J]. 水产科学, 2010, 29(12): 729-731.
    [43] WOO S J, CHUNG J K. Effects of trichlorfon on oxidative stress, neurotoxicity, and cortisol levels in common carp, Cyprinus carpio L., at different temperatures[J]. Comp Biochem Phys C, 2020, 229: 108698.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  41
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-04-30
  • 修回日期:  2023-07-13
  • 录用日期:  2023-08-01
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-08-10

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回