Enzymatic extraction and physicochemical properties of Porphyra haitanensis protein
-
摘要: 鲍鱼内脏中含有丰富的可分解藻类多糖的水解酶。为实现坛紫菜 (Porphyra haitanensis) 蛋白的高效提取和 产业化制备，采用鲍鱼内脏酶对坛紫菜进行酶法破壁提取紫菜蛋白。结果显示，鲍鱼内脏酶酶解坛紫菜提取蛋白的最佳条件为：加酶量7.6%、酶解时间2.8 h、酶解温度35 ℃、料液比质量体积比为1∶25，在该条件下获得的蛋白得率为 (238.65±2.13) mg∙g−1。观察坛紫菜的外观及细胞形态，发现鲍鱼内脏酶能显著破坏坛紫菜细胞壁。冷冻干燥坛紫菜蛋白 (Freeze-dried P. haitanensis protein, FPP) 在不同pH下的溶解性和乳化性能均优于喷雾干燥坛紫菜蛋白 (Spray-dried P. haitanensis protein, SPP) (P<0.01)，而SPP的表面疏水性与接触角均高于FPP (P<0.01)。扫描电镜结果显示， FPP为表面光滑的片状结构，而SPP呈大小较为均一、表面有凹槽的球状颗粒。综上，鲍鱼内脏酶能有效破坏坛紫菜细胞壁，使水溶性蛋白溶出，制备得到的蛋白均具有良好的理化特性，其中冷冻干燥所制备蛋白的理化性质更佳。Abstract: Abalone viscera is rich in hydrolytic enzymes that can decompose algal polysaccharides. In order to realize the highly efficient extraction and industrial preparation of Porphyra haitanensis protein, we used abalone visceral enzymes to break the cell wall of P. haitanensis to extract porphyra protein. The results show that the optimal enzymatic conditions were obtained as follows: enzyme dosage of 7.6%, enzymatic hydrolysis time of 2.8 h, enzymatic hydrolysis temperature of 35 ℃, and material-to-liquid ratio of 1:25. The protein yield under above conditions was (238.65±2.13) mg∙g−1. The results of appearance morphology and cell morphology of Porphyra haitanensis indicate that abalone viscera enzymatic digestion could disrupt the cell wall of P. haitanensis significantly. Freeze-dried P. haitanensis protein (FPP) showed better solubility and emulsification properties than spray-dried P. haitanensis protein (SPP) at different pHs (P<0.01), while the surface hydrophobicity and contact angle of SPP were higher than those of FPP (P<0.01). Scanning electron microscopy shows that FPP had a smooth lamellar surface, while SPP had a more uniform spherical particle size with grooves on the surface. In conclusion, the abalone viscera enzyme was effective in breaking the cell wall of P. haitanensis and causing the water-soluble proteins to leach out, and all the prepared proteins had good physicochemical properties, with the freeze-dried proteins having better physicochemical properties.
-
图 1 加酶量、温度、时间和料液比对鲍鱼内脏酶酶解紫菜的影响
注：同一序列中不同小写字母表示显著差异 (P<0.05)；图3、图6、图7同此。
Figure 1. Effects of enzyme addition, temperature, time and material-to-liquid ratio on enzymatic digestion of P. haitanensis by abalone viscera enzyme
Note: Different lowercase letters in the same series indicate significant difference (P<0.05). The same case in Fig. 3, Fig. 6 and Fig. 7.
图 2 加酶量、时间和温度交互作用响应面图和等高线图
Figure 2. Response surface and contour plots of enzyme addition, time and temperature interactions
图 3 不同破壁方式紫菜蛋白得率和固形物得率对比
Figure 3. Comparison of protein yield and solids yield of P. haitanensis by different cell wall breaking methods
图 4 不同破壁方式紫菜外观形态及光学显微镜图片(10×40)
注：从左到右依次为未处理、溶胀、冻融、超声、鲍鱼内脏酶酶解；a—e为外观形态，f—j为光学显微镜图片。
Figure 4. Appearance morphology and optical microscope pictures of P. haitanensis by different cell wall breaking methods (10×40)
Note: From left to right: untreated, lysed, freeze-thawed, sonicated and abalone visceral enzymatic digestion; a–e are appearance morphology, and f–j are optical microscope images.
图 7 pH对冻干坛紫菜蛋白和喷干坛紫菜蛋白乳化性和乳化稳定性的影响
Figure 7. Effect of pH on emulsification and emulsion stability of FPP and SPP
表 1 Box-Behnken Design 设计方案
Table 1. Box-Behnken Design solution
因素 Factor 水平 Level −1 0 1 A加酶量 Enzyme dosage/% 6 7 8 B酶解时间 Enzymolysis time/h 1 2 3 C酶解温度 Enzymolysis temperature/℃ 30 35 40 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 鲍鱼内脏酶酶解紫菜响应面实验设计及结果
Table 2. Response surface experimental design and results of enzymatic digestion of P. haitanensis by abalone viscera enzyme
序号
No.A：加酶量
Enzyme
dosage/%B：时间
t/hC：温度
Temperature/
℃Y：蛋白得率
Protein yield/
(mg∙g−1)1 6 1 35 158.46 2 8 1 35 189.04 3 6 3 35 183.47 4 8 3 35 242.13 5 6 2 30 174.96 6 8 2 30 215.56 7 6 2 40 168.66 8 8 2 40 209.65 9 7 1 30 185.99 10 7 3 30 219.76 11 7 1 40 178.40 12 7 3 40 217.07 13 7 2 35 229.99 14 7 2 35 232.14 15 7 2 35 231.90 16 7 2 35 226.36 17 7 2 35 228.45
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 回归模型方差分析
Table 3. Regression model analysis of variance
来源
Source平方和
SS自由度
df均方
MSF P 显著性
Sig.模型 Model 11 105.40 9 1 233.91 244.51 <0.000 1 ** A 3 648.83 1 3 648.83 723.04 <0.000 1 ** B 2 832.76 1 2 832.76 561.33 <0.000 1 ** C 63.27 1 63.27 12.54 0.009 5 ** AB 197.04 1 197.04 39.04 0.000 4 ** AC 0.038 1 0.038 0.007 554 0.933 2 BC 5.99 1 5.99 1.19 0.312 1 A2 2 092.93 1 2 092.93 414.93 <0.000 1 ** B2 849.05 1 849.05 168.24 <0.000 1 ** C2 981.24 1 981.24 194.44 <0.000 1 ** 残差 Residual 35.33 7 5.05 失拟差 Lack of fit 11.75 3 3.92 0.66 0.616 3 不显著 纯误差 Pure error 23.58 4 5.90 总和 Total 11 140.72 16 注：*. 差异显著 (P<0.05)；**. 差异极显著 (P<0.01)。 Note: *. Significant difference (P<0.05); **. Extremely significant difference (P<0.01).
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 农业农村部渔业渔政管理局, 全国水产技术推广总站, 中国水产学会. 2022中国渔业统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2022: 26-29. [2] GONG G, ZHAO J, WANG C, et al. Structural characterization and antioxidant activities of the degradation products from Porphyra haitanensis polysaccharides[J]. Process Biochem, 2018, 74: 185-193. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2018.05.022 [3] CAO J, WANG J, WANG S, et al. Porphyra species: Amini-review of its pharmacological and nutritional properties[J]. J Med Food, 2016, 19(2): 111-119. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2015.3426 [4] 郑彩云, 陈华新, 姜鹏, 等. 藻红蛋白的高效异源生物合成及其生物活性[J]. 生物技术, 2018, 28(2): 164-169. [5] LI W, LU L, LIU B, et al. Effects of phycocyanin on pulmonary and gut microbiota in a radiation-induced pulmonary fibrosis model[J]. Biomed Pharmacother, 2020, 132: 110826-110835. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110826 [6] PARDHASARADHI B V, ALI A M, KUMARI A L, et al. Phycocyanin-mediated apoptosis in AK-5 tumor cells involves down-regulation of Bcl-2 and generation of ROS[J]. Mol Cancer Ther, 2003, 2(11): 1165-1170. [7] FURUTA T, MIYABE Y, YASUI H, et al. Angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibitory peptides derived from phycobiliproteins of Dulse Palmaria palmata[J]. Mar Drugs, 2016, 14(2): 32. doi: 10.3390/md14020032 [8] LI W, SU H, PU Y, et al. Phycobiliproteins: molecular structure, production, applications, and prospects[J]. Biotechnol Adv, 2019, 37(2): 340-353. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.01.008 [9] 肖海芳, 马海乐, 孙进良, 等. 不同破壁方法对条斑紫菜藻红蛋白提取效果的影响[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2006(10): 54-56. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6521.2006.10.017 [10] 张笛, 曾庆梅, 王琳, 等. 微波辅助酶法提取绞股蓝皂苷工艺优化[J]. 食品科学, 2016, 37(12): 1-6. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201612001 [11] TAO Z, SUN L, QIU X, et al. Preparation, characterisation and use for antioxidant oligosaccharides of a cellulase from abalone (Haliotis discus hannai) viscera[J]. J Sci Food Agric, 2016, 96(9): 3088-3097. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.7484 [12] TSAO C, PAN Y, JIANG S. Purification and characterization of amylases from small abalone (Sulculus diversicolor aquatilis)[J]. J Agric Food Chem, 2003, 51(4): 1064-1070. doi: 10.1021/jf025837n [13] SUZUKI H, SUZUKI K, INOUE A, et al. A novel oligoalginate lyase from abalone, Haliotis discus hannai, that releases disaccharide from alginate polymer in an exolytic manner[J]. Carbohydr Res, 2006, 341(11): 1809-1819. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2006.04.032 [14] 文嘉欣. 鲍鱼内脏多糖水解酶及对魔芋胶的酶解改性研究[D]. 厦门: 集美大学, 2021: 1-60. [15] 王运吉, 刘金珍, 孙勉英, 等. 鲍鱼酶的制备及其性质[J]. 生物化学与生物物理进展, 1990(4): 302-304. [16] 孙乐常, 文嘉欣, 曹敏杰, 等. 一种水解紫菜的酶制剂及其制备方法: CN202011317457.7[P]. 2021-04-02. [17] 卢亚东, 张成楠, 李秀婷, 等. 不同干燥方式燕麦蛋白的性质及对肌原纤维蛋白凝胶特性的影响[J]. 食品科学技术学报, 2021, 39(6): 11. doi: 10.12301/j.issn.2095-6002.2021.06.007 [18] SHEN Y, TANG X, LI Y. Drying methods affect physicochemical and functional properties of quinoa protein isolate[J]. Food Chem, 2020, 339(10): 127823. [19] LIN N, LIU B, LIU Z, et al. Effects of different drying methods on the structures and functional properties of phosphorylated Antarctic krill protein[J]. J Food Sci, 2020, 85(11): 3690-3699. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.15503 [20] 时文芳, 白榕, 吕丽爽, 等. 喷雾干燥和冷冻干燥莲子蛋白结构及其功能特性的比较[J]. 食品科学, 2018, 39(9): 95-101. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201809015 [21] 陶志鹏. 皱纹盘鲍内脏纤维素酶的分离纯化与分子克隆[D]. 厦门: 集美大学, 2014: 1-56. [22] SHEN Y, XIAO K, LIANG P, et al. Improvement on the modified Lowry method against interference of divalent cations in soluble protein measurement[J]. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2013, 97(9): 4167-4178. doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-4783-3 [23] 李云嵌, 杨曦, 刘江, 等. 超声波辅助碱法提取美藤果分离蛋白及其加工性质研究[J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2021, 47(9): 128-135. doi: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.025990 [24] 郑惠彬, 郑温翔, 翁武银. 紫菜酶解物的制备及其特性[J]. 食品工业科技, 2013, 34(15): 107-111. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2013.15.010 [25] 段杉, 朱伟珊, 吴佳威. 利用纤维素酶辅助提取紫菜藻红蛋白的研究[J]. 水产科学, 2009, 28(5): 280-283. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1111.2009.05.010 [26] LATORRES J M, RIOS D G, SAGGIOMO G, et al. Functional and antioxidant properties of protein hydrolysates obtained from white shrimp ( Litopenaeus vannamei )[J]. J Food Sci Technol, 2018, 55(2): 721-729. doi: 10.1007/s13197-017-2983-z [27] 江军, 李帝明, 王亚雄, 等. pH值对酸水解卵清蛋白乳化性能的影响[J]. 食品科技, 2021, 46(6): 222-228. doi: 10.13684/j.cnki.spkj.2021.06.036 [28] 姚兴存, 李静, 舒留泉. 条斑紫菜活性肽的制备及其功能性质研究[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2011, 32(12): 12-15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6521.2011.12.004 [29] ELKSIBI I, HADDAR W, TICHA M B, et al. Development and optimisation of a non conventional extraction process of natural dye from olive solid waste using response surface methodology (RSM)[J]. Food Chem, 2014, 161: 345-352. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.03.108 [30] HOUSTON K, TUCKER M R, CHOWDHURY J, et al. The plant cell wall: a complex and dynamic structure as revealed by the responses of genes under stress conditions[J]. Front Plant Sci, 2016, 7: 984-1000. [31] CHEN F, ZHANG Q, GU H, et al. An approach for extraction of kernel oil from Pinus pumila using homogenate-circulating ultrasound in combination with an aqueous enzymatic process and evaluation of its antioxidant activity[J]. J Chromatogr A, 2016: 68-79. [32] SUZUKI K, OJIMA T, NISHITA K. Purification and cDNA cloning of a cellulase from abalone Haliotis discus hannai[J]. Eur J Biochem 2003, 270(4): 771-778. [33] 田雨, 江艳华, 郭莹莹, 等. 紫菜营养品质及食用价值研究进展[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2021, 12(12): 4929-4936. doi: 10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.2021.12.033 [34] GONG K, SHI A, LIU H, et al. Emulsifying properties and structure changes of spray and freeze-dried peanut protein isolate[J]. J Food Eng, 2016, 170: 33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.09.011 [35] 刘树兴, 郑灿辉, 何颖. 喷雾干燥法制备紫苏油微胶囊[J]. 粮食与油脂, 2019, 32(7): 29-33. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-9578.2019.07.009 [36] 徐海菊, 冯尚坤, 陈正冬, 等. 坛紫菜蛋白质提取工艺优化及其特性分析[J]. 食品工业科技, 2022, 43(12): 206-214. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021090055 [37] WANG Q, JIN Y, XIONG Y L. Heating-aided pH shifting modifies hemp seed protein structure, cross-linking, and emulsifying properties[J]. J Agric Food Chem, 2018, 66(41): 10827-10834. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b03901 [38] LIANG H, TANG C. pH-dependent emulsifying properties of pea [Pisum sativum (L. )] proteins[J]. Food Hydrocoll, 2013, 33(2): 309-319. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.04.005 [39] HALLING P J. Protein-stabilized foams and emulsions[J]. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 1981, 15(2): 155-203. doi: 10.1080/10408398109527315 [40] LIU F, TANG C. Soy protein nanoparticle aggregates as Pickering stabilizers for oil-in-water emulsions[J]. J Agric Food Chem, 2013, 61(37): 8888-8898. doi: 10.1021/jf401859y [41] 黄群, 麻成金, 周姣, 等. 干燥方法及理化因素对鹌鹑蛋白粉功能特性的影响[J]. 食品科学, 2008(10): 299-302. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-6630.2008.10.067 -
计量
- 文章访问数: 50
- 被引次数: 0
粤公网安备 44010502001741号
