Effect evaluation of alizarin complexone marking for otoliths of juvenile black carp (Mylopharyngodon piceus)
-
摘要: 放流标记技术研究是支撑增殖放流效果评估的重要内容。该研究用质量浓度为100 mg·L−1的茜素络合物 (ALC) 对约2月龄的青鱼 (Mylopharyngodon piceus) 幼鱼进行48 h浸泡,随后移入正常水体中恢复续养20 d。对其3种耳石在可见光和不同的激发光下进行比较分析,评价了茜素络合物在不同耳石上的沉积情况与标记效果。结果表明,通过在可见光和不同的激发光下进行观察,其3种耳石上均可见明显的标记区,标记率达100%。在对标记鱼恢复续养20 d后发现,耳石上的荧光标记区强度仍很高,表现出了较好的标记效果。此外,相关标记的最佳检测光源为蓝色激发光,绿色激发光次之。微耳石是用于青鱼幼鱼耳石荧光标记观察的最适类型,同时也是用于时滞检测的最适类型,其次是星耳石。此外,将鱼体浸泡入茜素络合物溶液中至其在耳石上形成标记沉积,以及将鱼体移出浸泡溶液至其耳石上标记区域消失,均存在1 d时滞。Abstract: Investigation on artificial marking technology is very important supporting work for national fish mark release recapture and effectiveness tracing evaluation issues. In this study, two-month old juvenile black carps (Mylopharyngodon piceus) had been immersed in alizarin complexone (ALC) at a concentration of 100 mg·L−1 for 48 h, and then transferred to normal water for 20 d. Three pairs of otoliths (i.e., sagitta, lapillus and asteriscus) were removed from the black carps by continuous sampling, observed under fluorescence microscope and photographed, so as to evaluate the characteristics of deposition and the marking effect of ALC in different otoliths. The results show that the marked areas were clearly observed in each otolith pair under visible light and different excitation light, with a 100% mark success rate. After 20 d of recovery culture in normal water without ALC, the intensity of ALC mark in otoliths of the marked fish was still very high, showing a good marking effect. Moreover, the optimum light source was blue excitation light, followed by green excitation light. The lapillus was the optimal otolith type for ALC marking and for judgment of time lag among the three pairs of otoliths, followed by asteriscus. In addition, there was a time lag of 1 day between the carps immersed in ALC solution and ALC deposition into otolith, as well as between removing immersed carps from ALC solution and disappearance of ALC mark from otolith.
-
Key words:
- Mylopharyngodon piceus /
- Otolith /
- Fluorescent marking /
- Alizarin complexone /
- Enhancement release
-
图 3 经茜素络合物标记后恢复续养第10天时青鱼幼鱼矢耳石、微耳石、星耳石分别在可见光、蓝色激发光、绿色激发光和紫色激发光下的标记效果
a1. 矢耳石分别在可见光、蓝色激发光、绿色激发光和紫色激发光下的标记效果;b1. 微耳石分别在可见光、蓝色激发光、绿色激发光和紫色激发光下的标记效果;c1. 星耳石分别在可见光、蓝色激发光、绿色激发光和紫色激发光下的标记效果;图中白色箭头表示由矢耳石、微耳石、星耳石核心指向荧光标记轮。
Figure 3. Marking effect of three types of otoliths of juvenile black carp under different light sources on 10th day of recovery culture after ALC immersion
a1. Marking effect of sagitta under visible light, blue excitation light, green excitation light and purple excitation light; b1. Marking effect of lapillus under visible light, blue excitation light, green excitation light and purple excitation light; c1. Marking effect of asteriscus under visible light, blue excitation light, green excitation light and purple excitation light. The white arrows show that the core of sagitta, lapillus and asteriscus point to the fluorescent marker ring.
图 5 青鱼幼鱼经茜素络合物浸泡标记后恢复续养第5天时微耳石标记效果
2个白色箭头分别指向微耳石的2条紫红色标记环;黑色短线表示微耳石新形成的日轮所在位置,即为一明带和一暗带组合;4个黑色箭头则分别指向微耳石外部新形成的4个日轮。
Figure 5. Marking effect of lapillus of juvenile black carp under four light sources on 5th day of recovery culture after ALC immersion
Two white arrows point to two purple red marker rings in lapillus; the black dash shows the position of the newly formed daily growth increments in lapillus, which is a combination of a bright band and a dark band; the four black arrows point outward to the four newly formed daily growth increments in lapillus.
表 1 青鱼幼鱼3类耳石在不同光源下的检测效果
Table 1. Detection effect of three types of otoliths from juvenile black carp under four different light sources
恢复续养天数
Days of recovery
culture/d实验鱼数
Number of
fish耳石类型
Otolith
type耳石标本数
Number of
otolith标记强度 Marker intensity 可见光
BS蓝色激发光
WBS绿色激发光
WGS紫色激发光
WUS0 5 矢耳石 10 2 (++) 2 (++) 2 (++) 1 (+) 5 5 矢耳石 10 2 (++) 3 (+++) 3 (+++) 2 (++) 10 5 矢耳石 10 2 (++) 4 (++++) 3 (+++) 2 (++) 15 5 矢耳石 10 1 (+) 4 (++++) 3 (+++) 2 (++) 20 5 矢耳石 10 1 (+) 3 (+++) 2 (++) 1 (+) 0 5 微耳石 10 2 (++) 3 (+++) 3 (+++) 2 (++) 5 5 微耳石 10 3 (+++) 4 (++++) 4 (++++) 3 (+++) 10 5 微耳石 10 3 (+++) 4 (++++) 4 (++++) 3 (+++) 15 5 微耳石 10 2 (++) 4 (++++) 4 (++++) 3 (+++) 20 5 微耳石 10 2 (++) 4 (++++) 4 (++++) 2 (++) 0 5 星耳石 10 2 (++) 2 (++) 2 (++) 1 (+) 5 5 星耳石 10 3 (+++) 3 (+++) 2 (++) 1 (+) 10 5 星耳石 10 3 (+++) 3 (+++) 2 (++) 1 (+) 15 5 星耳石 10 3 (+++) 2 (++) 1 (+) 1 (+) 20 5 星耳石 10 2 (++) 2 (++) 1 (+) 1 (+) -
[1] ITAKURA H, YOKOUCHI K, KANAZAWA T, et al. Diverse downstream migration patterns of the anadromous Japanese grenadier anchovy Coilia nasus in the Chikugo River estuary and Ariake Sea, Japan[J]. Reg Stud Mar Sci, 2020, 39: 101436. doi: 10.1016/j.rsma.2020.101436 [2] WARREN-MYERS F, DEMPSTER T, SWEARER S E. Otolith mass marking techniques for aquaculture and restocking: benefits and limitations[J]. Rev Fish Biol Fish, 2018, 28(3): 485-501. doi: 10.1007/s11160-018-9515-4 [3] OSMUNDSON, D B, WHITE G C. Long-term mark-recapture monitoring of a Colorado pikeminnow Ptychocheilus lucius population: assessing recovery progress using demographic trends[J]. Endanger Species Res, 2017, 34: 131-147. doi: 10.3354/esr00842 [4] STEWART D R, BUTLER M J, HARRIS G, et al. Mar-recapture models identify imminent extinction of Yaqui catfish Ictalurus pricei in the United States[J]. Biol Conserv, 2017, 209: 45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.02.010 [5] SKILBREI O T. Reduced migratory performance of farmed Atlantic salmon post-smolts from a simulated escape during autumn[J]. Aquacult Environ Interact, 2010, 1(2): 117-125. doi: 10.3354/aei00013 [6] 韩叶, 郑伟, 康学会, 等. 基于微卫星标记的图们江大麻哈鱼亲子鉴定技术研究[J]. 南方水产科学, 2020, 16(4): 84-89. doi: 10.12131/20200029 [7] BECKER A, FIELDER D S, LOWRY M B, et al. Development of a calcein marking technique for juvenile mulloway Argyrosomus japonicus to be used in stock enhancement programs[J]. N Am J Fish Manag, 2017, 37(1): 207-210. doi: 10.1080/02755947.2016.1254126 [8] STÖTERA S, DEGEN-SMYREK A K, KRUMME U, et al. Marking otoliths of Baltic cod (Gadus morhua Linnaeus, 1758) with tetracycline and strontium chloride[J]. J Appl Ichthyol, 2019, 35(2): 427-435. doi: 10.1111/jai.13829 [9] UNFER G, PINTER K. Marking otoliths of brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) embryos with alizarin red S[J]. J Appl Ichthyol, 2013, 29(2): 470-473. doi: 10.1111/jai.12100 [10] THOMAS O R B, SWEARER S E. Otolith biochemistry: a review[J]. Rev Fish Sci Aquacult, 2019, 27(4): 458-489. doi: 10.1080/23308249.2019.1627285 [11] 姜涛, 郑朝臣, 黄洪辉, 等. 基于地标点法的九龙江口和珠江口凤鲚和七丝鲚耳石形态学特征比较[J]. 南方水产科学, 2018, 14(6): 10-16. doi: 10.12131/20180097 [12] KHUMBANYIWA D D, LI M, JIANG T, et al. Unraveling habitat use of Coilia nasus from Qiantang River of China by otolith microchemistry[J]. Reg Stud Mar Sci, 2018, 18: 122-128. doi: 10.1016/j.rsma.2018.02.001 [13] TRAN N T, LABONNE M, HOANG H D, et al. Changes in environmental salinity during the life of Pangasius krempfi in the Mekong Delta (Vietnam) estimated from otolith Sr: Ca ratios[J]. Mar Freshw Res, 2019, 70(12): 1734-1746. doi: 10.1071/MF18269 [14] SNOW R A, LONG J M, PORTA M J. Marking otoliths of alligator gar by immersion in oxytetracycline[J]. N Am J Fish Manag, 2020, 40(3): 669-674. doi: 10.1002/nafm.10365 [15] LEJK A M, RADTKE G. Effect of marking Salmo trutta lacustris L. larvae with alizarin red S on their subsequent growth, condition, and distribution as juveniles in a natural stream[J]. Fish Res, 2021, 234: 105786. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2020.105786 [16] COTTINGHAM A, HALL N G, LONERAGAN N R, et al. Efficacy of restocking an estuarine-resident species demonstrated by long-term monitoring of cultured fish with alizarin complexone-stained otoliths. A case study[J]. Fish Res, 2020, 227: 105556. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2020.105556 [17] 王正鲲, 赵天, 林小涛, 等. 茜素络合物对唐鱼耳石标记效果以及生长和存活率的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(1): 189-194. [18] 徐永江, 柳学周, 史宝, 等. 茜素络合物对半滑舌鳎 (Cynoglossus semilaevis) 苗种耳石的染色标记效果[J]. 渔业科学进展, 2016, 37(6): 11-18. doi: 10.11758/yykxjz.20151105002 [19] 杨君兴, 潘晓赋, 陈小勇, 等. 中国淡水鱼类人工增殖放流现状[J]. 动物学研究, 2013, 34(4): 267-280. [20] 朱滨, 郑海涛, 乔晔, 等. 长江流域淡水鱼类人工繁殖放流及其生态作用[J]. 中国渔业经济, 2009, 27(2): 74-87. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-590X.2009.02.012 [21] 王丰, 张猛, 沈玉帮, 等. 青鱼微卫星标记的开发与特性分析[J]. 动物学杂志, 2019, 54(1): 57-65. [22] 邱晨, 姜涛, 陈修报, 等. 茜素络合物对鲤仔鱼耳石标记特征研究[J]. 水产学报, 2018, 42(11): 1754-1765. [23] 刘岩, 孙典荣, 耿倩, 等. 茜素红与钙黄绿素标记不同规格黑鲷幼鱼的比较研究[J]. 南方水产科学, 2016, 12(6): 17-24. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2016.06.003 [24] 欧阳斌, 常剑波. 荧光物质浸泡标记稀有鲫和彭泽鲫仔、稚鱼[J]. 水生生物学报, 1999, 23(4): 324-329. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3207.1999.04.005 [25] 邱晨, 姜涛, 陈修报, 等. 鲫幼鱼耳石荧光标记效果[J]. 动物学杂志, 2019, 54(5): 678-686. [26] 赵亚鹏, 潘晓赋, 杨君兴, 等. 滇池金线鲃 (Sinocyclocheilus grahami) 耳石的茜素红及茜素络合物标志[J]. 动物学研究, 2013, 34(5): 499-503. [27] 刘清, 崔玲, 管永晶, 等. 使用茜素络合物标记鳙耳石[J]. 西北农业学报, 2020, 29(10): 1479-1484. [28] 靳建波, 危起伟, 孙庆亮, 等. 茜素络合物浸泡标记秦岭细鳞鲑发眼卵及仔鱼耳石[J]. 淡水渔业, 2011, 41(2): 10-17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6907.2011.02.002 [29] 朱亚华, 姜涛, 陈修报, 等. 草鱼仔鱼耳石茜素络合物标记特征研究[J]. 渔业科学进展, 2020, 41(6): 28-36. [30] 邱晨, 姜涛, 陈修报, 等. 鲤 (Cyprinus carpio) 仔鱼耳石锶 (Sr) 标记及其时滞特征的研究[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2019, 50(4): 903-912. doi: 10.11693/hyhz20190100003 [31] LÜ H J, FU M, ZHANG Z X, et al. Marking fish with fluorochrome dyes[J]. Rev Fish Sci Aquacult, 2020, 28(1): 117-135. doi: 10.1080/23308249.2019.1681358 -