Population structure of Trichiurus japonicus in northern South China Sea and parameters of its growth, mortality and maturity
-
摘要: 根据2014—2015年南海北部底拖网渔业调查数据,对带鱼 (Trichiurus japonicus) 的渔获率、群体结构、性比与性腺发育、生长及死亡参数等进行了研究。结果表明:1) 2014—2015年南海北部带鱼肛长频率分布为单峰型,优势肛长组为160~190 mm,雌、雄个体的肛长组成无显著差异 (P>0.05);2) 春季雌性个体占比较大,4个季度雌雄比与1∶1均有显著差异 (P<0.05);性成熟度以Ⅱ期为主,占比高达74.2%;最小性成熟肛长为113 mm,50%性成熟肛长 (L50) 为241.5 mm;3) 电子体长频率分析法评估的带鱼渐近肛长为585 mm,生长系数为0.2 a−1,总死亡系数为1.172,自然死亡系数为0.475,开发率为0.59。虽然带鱼当前仍处于过度捕捞状态,但个体平均肛长有恢复迹象。Abstract: Based on the data of bottom trawl fishery survey in northern South China Sea from 2014 to 2015, we investigated the catch rate, population structure, sex ratio, gonadal development, growth and death parameters of Trichiurus japonicus. Results show that: 1) the anal length frequency distribution of hairtail during 2014−2015 was unimodal, and the dominant anal length group was of 160−190 mm. There was no significant difference in the anal length composition between male and female (P>0.05). 2) The proportion of female in spring was relatively higher, the and the ratios of female to male in four seasons were significantly different from 1∶1 (P<0.05). Their gonadal maturity was mainly at Level 2, accounting for 74.2% of the total. The minimum maturity length was 113 mm, and the estimated anal length at 50% sexual maturity (L50) was 241.5 mm. 3) The estimated asymptotic anal length (L∞) and growth parameter (K) calculated by Electronic Length Frequency Analysis I (ELEFANⅠ) were 585 mm and 0.20 a−1, respectively. The estimated total mortality coefficient (Z) and natural mortality coefficient (M) were 1.172 and 0.475, respectively. Although the exploitation rate of 0.59 indicates that although T. japonicus resources are still in a state of overfishing, the average anal length of the individuals shows signs of recovery.
-
Key words:
- Trichiurus japonicus /
- Population structure /
- Growth /
- Mortality /
- Northern South China Sea
-
表 1 带鱼的群体结构
Table 1. Population structure of T. japonicus
采样时间
Sampling time尾数
Number性比 (♀/♂)
Sex ratio肛长 Anal length/mm 体质量 Body mass/g 范围
Range均值
Mean优势组
Dominant范围
Range均值
Mean优势组
Dominant春 Spring 243 2.96 70~451 185.0 130~170 11~1200 128.5 20~60; 80~90 夏 Summer 428 1.66 61~505 184.1 160~210 10~1462 101.7 30~50; 60~80 秋 Autumn 178 0.67 87~500 246.8 230~250 9~1400 232.4 190~200 冬 Winter 279 1.11 92~528 199.9 160~200 13~1650 136.8 50~90 表 2 不同海区带鱼的种群参数
Table 2. Population parameters of T. japonicus in different sea areas
海区及采样时间
Sea area and sampling time肛长范围
Anal length range/mm平均
肛长
Mean anal
length/mm异速生
长因子
b渐近肛长
L∞/mm生长
系数
K/a50%性
成熟肛长
L50/mm自然死
亡系数
M总死亡
系数
E参数评估方法
Assessment method for parameters印尼阿拉弗拉海 (2008)[15]
Arafura Sea of Indonesia123~650 343.00 2.420 − − 368.0 − − 体长频率法
Length-frequency method缅甸外海 (2012—2013)[16]
Andaman Sea of Myanmar101~422 212.26 2.752 − − 242.7 − − 体长频率法
Length-frequency method伊朗阿曼湾 (2017—2018)[17]
Iran's Gulf of Oman119~580 − 2.914 610.4 0.220 242.3 − − 体长频率法
Length-frequency method福建闽南渔场 (2000—2002)[18]
Minnan Sea of Fujian52~332 160.00 2.529 − − − − − 体长频率法
Length-frequency method东海 (2002—2004)[19]
East China Sea− − 3.006 493.0 0.346 − − − 年龄鉴定法
Age-determination method东海近海 (2007—2008)[20]
Costal waters of East China Sea126~332 182.62 2.795 − − 164.7 − − 体长频率法
Length-frequency method北部湾 (2006—2007)[21]
Beibu Gulf20~896 − 2.970 − − − − − − 南海北部 (1981—1982)[22]
Northern South China Sea132~605 342.84 2.400 622.0 0.160 322.0 0.212 0.71 体长频率法
Length-frequency method南海北部 (1997—1999)[2]
Northern South China Sea20~670 187.60 3.028 700.0 0.270 276.0 0.390 0.87 体长频率法
Length-frequency method南海北部 (2014—2015) (本研究)
Northern South China Sea (This study)61~528 198.10 2.790 585.0 0.200 241.5 0.475 0.59 体长频率法
Length-frequency method注:−. 文献中未查找到相应的参数值或评估方法 Note: −. Values of parameter or assessment method are not found in the References. -
[1] 王跃中, 袁蔚文. 南海北部底拖网渔业资源的数量变动[J]. 南方水产, 2008, 4(2): 26-33. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2008.02.005 [2] 朱江峰, 邱永松. 南海北部带鱼生长死亡与参数动态综合模式[J]. 海洋学报, 2005, 27(6): 95-101. [3] 王跃中, 孙典荣, 陈作志, 等. 气候环境因子和捕捞压力对南海北部带鱼渔获量变动的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(24): 7948-7957. [4] 颜云榕. 北部湾主要鱼类摄食生态及食物关系的研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院研究生院, 2010: 25-33. [5] 詹秉义. 渔业资源评估[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1995: 25-120. [6] 史登福, 张魁, 陈作志. 基于生活史特征的数据有限条件下渔业资源评估方法比较[J]. 中国水产科学, 2020, 27(1): 12-24. [7] LI Z L, SHAN X J, JIN X S, et al. Long-term variations in body length and age at maturity of the small yellow croaker (Larimichthys polyactis Bleeker, 1877) in the Bohai Sea and the Yellow Sea, China[J]. Fish Res, 2011, 110(1): 67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2011.03.013 [8] 程家骅, 林龙山. 东海区鲐鱼生物学特征及其渔业现状的分析研究[J]. 海洋渔业, 2004, 26(2): 73-78. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2490.2004.02.001 [9] 张魁, 陈作志, 王跃中, 等. 北部湾短尾大眼鲷群体结构及生长、死亡和性成熟参数估计[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2016, 35(5): 20-28. [10] 刘维达, 林昭进, 江艳娥, 等. 南海北部陆架区底层渔业资源的空间分布特征[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2011, 30(5): 95-103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5470.2011.05.013 [11] 蔡研聪, 黄梓荣, 许友伟, 等. 南海北部近海渔业资源密度概率分布特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(7): 2426-2436. [12] FROESE R. Cube law, condition factor and weight-length relationships: history, meta-analysis and recommendations[J]. J Appl Ichthyol, 2006, 22(4): 241-253. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2006.00805.x [13] FREDDY A, ALEXANDER B. Sex ratios, spawning seasonality, sexual maturity, and fecundity of white marlin (Tetrapturus albidus) from the western central Atlantic[J]. Fish Res, 2009, 95: 98-111. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2008.08.010 [14] PAULY D. On the interrelationships between natural mortality, growth parameters, and mean environmental temperature in 175 fish stocks[J]. ICES J Mar Sci, 1980, 39(2): 175-192. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/39.2.175 [15] 朱清澄, 马伟刚, 花传祥, 等. 印尼阿拉弗拉海大西洋带鱼生物学特性的初步研究[J]. 上海海洋大学学报, 2009, 18(5): 593-598. [16] 金鑫. 缅甸外海大西洋带鱼渔业生物学及其产量分布初步研究[D]. 上海: 上海海洋大学, 2014: 14-18. [17] 王帅纲, 张敏, 邹晓荣, 等. 伊朗阿曼湾海域带鱼生物学特性研究[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2020, 35(3): 432-438. [18] 颜尤明. 福建海区带鱼生物学特征与资源变化的研究[J]. 南方水产, 2005, 1(3): 32-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0780.2005.03.005 [19] 严利平, 胡芬, 李建生, 等. 东海带鱼年龄与生长的研究[J]. 海洋渔业, 2005, 27(2): 139-142. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2490.2005.02.009 [20] 陈云龙, 单秀娟, 戴芳群, 等. 东海近海带鱼群体相对资源密度、空间分布及其产卵群体的结构特征[J]. 渔业科学进展, 2013, 34(4): 8-15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7075.2013.04.002 [21] WANG X H, QIU Y S, ZHU G P. Length-weight relationships of 69 fish species in the Beibu Gulf, northern South China Sea[J]. J Appl Ichthyol, 2011, 27(3): 959-961. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2010.01624.x [22] 张进上. 南海北部大陆架海域渔业资源调查及区划研究: 外海重点鱼类资源调查带鱼生物学测定记录[R]. 广州: 中国水产科学研究院南海水产研究所, 1982: 1-17. [23] GULLAND J A. Fish stock assessment: a manual of basic method[M]. New York: Wiley, 1983: 87-125. [24] CONOVER D, MUNCH S. Sustaining fisheries yield over evolutionary time scales[J]. Science, 2002, 297(5578): 94-96. doi: 10.1126/science.1074085 [25] 唐启升. 中国专属经济区海洋生物资源与栖息环境[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2006: 680-681. [26] 贾晓平, 李永振, 李纯厚, 等. 南海专属经济区和大陆架渔业生态环境与渔业资源[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004: 393-394. [27] 陈作志, 孔啸兰, 徐姗楠, 等. 北部湾深水金线鱼种群参数的动态变化[J]. 水产学报, 2012, 36(4): 584-591. [28] 林龙山, 程家骅, 任一平, 等. 东海区小黄鱼种群生物学特性的分析[J]. 中国水产科学, 2004, 11(4): 333-338. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-8737.2004.04.010 [29] HE X B, LI J, CHEN S, et al. Length-weight relationship and population dynamics of Bombay duck (Harpadon nehereus) in the Min River Estuary, East China Sea[J]. Thalassas, 2019, 35: 253-261. [30] 殷名称. 鱼类生态学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1995: 34-38. [31] FUKUWAKA M A, MORITA K. Increase in maturation size after the closure of a high seas gillnet fishery on hatchery-reared chum salmon Oncorhynchus keta[J]. Evol Appl, 2008, 1(2): 376-387. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2008.00029.x [32] 陈作志, 林昭进, 邱永松. 基于AHP的南海海域渔业资源可持续利用评价[J]. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(2): 249-258. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2010.02.009 [33] ZHANG K, CAI Y C, LIAO B C, et al. Population dynamics of threadfin porgy Evynnis cardinalis, an endangered species on IUCN red list in the Beibu Gulf, South China Sea[J]. J Fish Biol, 2020, 97(2): 14398. doi: 10.1111/jfb.14398 [34] 耿平, 张魁, 陈作志, 等. 北部湾蓝圆鲹生物学特征及开发状态的年际变化[J]. 南方水产科学, 2018, 14(6): 1-9. doi: 10.12131/20180106 [35] 张魁, 廖宝超, 许友伟, 等. 基于渔业统计数据的南海区渔业资源可捕量评估[J]. 海洋学报, 2017, 39(8): 25-33. -